Friday, 12 April 2013

Jesus in America

I saw this on Facebook but since I don’t share this kind of thing on there anymore because of the Mormon thought police I had to share it here. It is in the category of Things Jesus Never Said:

Thursday, 11 April 2013

General Conference: April 2013 Saturday Afternoon Session

I have had the privilege occassionaly of guest posting on Bobby Gilpin’s blog Mormonism Investigated We are currently covering the Saturday afternoon session of the recent Mormon General Conference. The blog is well worth following and Bobby has marshalled a small band of us to comment on conference twice a year as well as on the major Mormon study books for the year – Teachings of the Presidents of the Church - this year’s being Lorenzo Snow.

This is my latest contribution:

sunday-am-april-2013-screen

I have picked out for comment some themes I see running through the Saturday afternoon session of the Mormon conference. The theme of families increasingly causes problems for them and I touch on the changes made in their new edition of the Scriptures, a subject I will be covering in more detail soon. Particularly interesting are the “dry” statistical reports which, if you know what to look for, can be very enlightening, not so much for what they say as for what they don’t say.

In May my church will hold its AGM where the financial accounts will be made available to members. We do this because the church is the people, not the building or the institution, and church leaders are servants of the people, the church, to whom we are accountable.

Mormon Statistics

The Saturday afternoon session began with the sustaining of church officers and a report from Robert W Cantwell, Managing Director of the Church Audit Report:

“Based upon audits performed, the Church Auditing Department is of the opinion that, in all material respects, contributions received, expenditures made, and assets of the Church have been recorded and administered in accordance with appropriate accounting practices, approved budgets, and Church policies and procedures.”

Short on detail this wouldn’t inspire confidence in anyone but a true believing Mormon. The Mormon Church was incorporated in Utah as early as 1851 by Brigham Young and has several tax-exempt corporations including the Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, organized in 1916 to handle property, the Corporation of the President of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints organised in 1823 to handle money and Intellectual Reserve Inc. organised in 1997 to handle intellectual rights.

While UK law requires limited companies to submit accounts to companies house for public scrutiny no such legal requirement is made in US law. Businessweek produced an interesting study on the subject in July 2012. The Mormon corporation, therefore, is accountable neither to the the public from whom it derives tax benefits nor to its own members whose money they collect and use. By comparison a telling state of affairs… Continue Reading

Wednesday, 10 April 2013

Mormon Africa!

There are three operating Mormon temples in Africa, Accra, Ghana, Aba, Nigeria, and Johannesburg, South Africa. and two more are in planning and approval stage, Kinshasa, DRC and Durban, South Africa.

It has been interesting to see how the Mormon Church has handled what might be a delicate situation on a continent the vast majority of whose population would, until 1978, have been persona non grata in Mormonism. Up to that time the attitude and official doctrine regarding people of African descent might be summed up in the words of Bruce R McConkie:

“Though he was a rebel and an associate of Lucifer in pre-existence, and though he was a liar from the beginning whose name was Perdition, Cain managed to attain the privilege of mortal birth... he came out in open rebellion, fought God, worshipped Lucifer, and slew Abel...

As a result of his rebellion, Cain was cursed with a dark skin; he became the father of the Negroes, and those spirits who were not worthy to receive the priesthood are born through his lineage.” (Mormon Doctrine, Bruce R. McConkie, 1958, p.102. emphasis added)

John Taylor, Mormonism’s third prophet, declared of Negroes:

“And after the flood we are told that the curse that had been pronounced upon Cain was continued through Ham's wife, as he had married a wife of that seed. And why did it pass through the flood? Because it was necessary that the devil should have a representation upon the earth as well as God.” (Journal of Discourse, vol.22, p.304. emphasis added)

Growth – at any cost

From its earliest days until 1978 Negroes were denied the priesthood. On June 9, 1978 church leaders announced a remarkable change in doctrine that removed this prohibition. Today men of African lineage are given "all the privileges and blessings which the gospel affords." (Deseret News, June 9, 1978)

The recently published new edition of Mormon Scripture contains significant changes to the preface to that “revelation,” acknowledging that, although Mormons believed for 130 years that Black men could not hold office in the church they cannot understand or explain why. A remarkable state of affairs given Mormons claim their leaders are prophets.

The decision to allow Negroes to hold priesthood office has opened up a whole new mission field for the church. Church membership in South Africa between 1935 and 1965 increased by 3,500 members. Between 1965 and 1993 the increase was over 17,000. A growth of 362% in less than thirty years, directly attributable, by the church's own admission, to the announcement of June 1978.

In 1979, the year following the announcement, President Spencer W Kimball re-dedicated South Africa (there had been Mormon activity in South Africa as early as the 1850’s). 1985 saw the dedication of the Johannesburg Temple. By 1990 Africa was made a separate Area, with headquarters in Johannesburg. In East Africa the first Kenyan to join the church was baptised in 1980. Uganda saw its first baptisms in the late 1980's and one of the first baptisms for Tanzania took place in 1990.

Overall church growth in the last twenty years is in no small part attributable to the influx of Africans, or people of African descent. The strengthening of the church by this means has been so effective one wonders why the decision to admit Negroes was not made earlier. There hangs a tale. The history of this aspect of church policy makes one wonder why the decision was made at all if not for the sake of expediency.

This dubious history notwithstanding, Gordon B Hinckley expressed gratitude "for the brotherhood that exists among us, that neither colour of skin nor land of birth can separate us as thy sons and daughters," as he dedicated the Accra Ghana Temple on Sunday, 11 January, 2004.

Satan’s Stronghold?

Yet the idea of a connection between the African and Satan still lingers. In an issue the unofficial Mormon on-line magazine, Meridian, began publishing a series of exerts from a book, Safe Journey; An African Adventure, by Glen L. Pace, which looks at the Mormon experience in Africa. The first instalment begins thus:

“When the temple is dedicated in Ghana, Sunday, January 11, by President Gordon B. Hinckley it will be, according to Glenn L. Pace, ‘like an atomic bomb has been dropped right in the middle of Satan’s stronghold in West Africa. It will be the most significant thing that as affected West Africa since the atonement and resurrection of Jesus Christ. It will be the beginning of the end of Satan’s hold on these countries.’” (emphasis added)

I confess, I marvelled at this audacious rewriting of history. It is as though nothing of any significance pertaining to the Christian faith had happened there for two thousand years.

Telling how it was Africans, having read Mormon literature that had come their way, who had written to the church asking for ‘holy books’ he writes:

“Slowly, without the authority of the Church and without knowledge of each other, congregations spontaneously arose as people were touched by the message. They built small meetinghouses (sic); they patterned their doctrine and teachings after the Church, some even named themselves The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Without priesthood authority and direction, these churches had omissions and errors. In some there were hallelujahs, drum beats and the passing of collection plates. Yet what was clear as Elder Pace reiterates in his book the message of the gospel is universal. In Africa, it found an exuberant, innately spiritual people, hungry for the message.” (Note “without the authority of the church”)

Hallelujahs? Drumbeats? The passing of collection plates? You can almost taste the contempt for these things in the writer’s words. I wonder what this man thought “Hallelujahs” signified? I wonder if he thought what the collections were for, and where this custom came from? I wonder if he even understood that Africa has a rich Christian history and a strong Christian presence in the world today? The following potted history of African Christianity, for which I am grateful to Christian network links for Africa, gives just a glimpse of that continent’s Christian heritage:

Christianity in Africa

Christianity came to Africa in the 1st century AD. Tradition records that it was St Mark who planted the church in Alexandria about AD 65. Even before that, however, the New Testament records that Jesus and his family were refugees in Egypt, and so it would have been in Africa that he learnt to walk and talk.

The first Christians in Egypt were mostly Jews and Greeks who were living there, but by the end of the second century large numbers of native Egyptians were joining the church, and the scriptures were translated into three local languages. In the 3rd century the Christians suffered several persecutions from the Roman rulers, and in Egypt some fled as refugees to the deserts. When the persecutions died down, they stayed to pray, and the first monastic communities were formed. Monasticism spread to other parts of the church as well, and so this was one of the African contributions to global Christianity.

In the 4th century there were several theological controversies in Africa, and one of the most significant was that between Arius and Athanasius. Their dispute forced Christians to define certain articles of the Christian faith more closely, and the Symbol of Faith or Nicene Creed was the result. The statement of faith that (with some variations) is accepted by most Christians around the world has its roots in African theology.

Christianity in Africa therefore goes back a long way!

There were also Christian communities in north-western Africa, in the area today called the Maghreb, which includes Tunisia and northern Algeria. The church there was part of the Western Church, centred on Rome, though it, too, produced some influential theologians, such as Cyprian and Augustine.

The African church enjoyed a respite from persecution for 300 years, from the 4th to the 6th centuries, but in the 7th century Arabs invaded Africa, and conquered most of North Africa. The Arabs were Muslim, and so Christians became second-class citizens except in Ethiopia, which managed to retain its independence. Christianity began to spread southward from Ethiopia in the 12th and 13th centuries, but only slowly, because of Arab naval supremacy in the Indian Ocean.

The Arab naval supremacy was broken by the Portuguese in the 16th century, and they established some Christian missions along parts of the east and west coasts of Africa. In the 17th century the Portuguese lost their naval supremacy to the Dutch, who established a trading outpost in Southern Africa. Other European nations became interested in Africa for purposes of trade, and much of the trade was in human beings, who were forced to emigrate to the Americas as slaves.

In the 19th century many missionaries from Europe and America came to Africa and started churches in various parts of the continent south of the Sahara. The Christian faith spread slowly at first, but then more rapidly. In the 20th century most mission was through African initiative, and done by members of African independent churches, but also by members of international denominations. Now, at the end of the 20th century, Africa is probably the most Christian continent. There are more Anglicans in Nigeria, for example, than in Britain and the USA.

There are more than 7000 Christian denominations in South Africa alone, ranging in size from a couple of dozen to several million. There are many more in other parts of the continent. Most of these are not on line, and there are many things in African Christianity that the wired world can't even begin to imagine. Nevertheless, we hope these links will give something of the varied flavours on Christianity on this continent.

Steve Hayes

Webmaster: Christian network links for Africa

http://www.fortunecity.com/meltingpot/cecilian/777/

Christian Work Continues

I would add that Uganda is experiencing success in dealing with the AIDS epidemic as no other African nation, in no small part because of its Christian nature which makes for progressive and enlightened thinking that other nations are slower to embrace.

Satan’s stronghold? Or Mormonism, once again, is riding on the back of a rich and proud Christian heritage. When the Accra temple held it’s open house Mormonism Researched Ministry were there, helping local Christians present a positive witness and encouraging and teaching them in their Christian faith.

Quoting Operation World, Bill McKeever reported that 64% of Ghanaians regard themselves as Christians, although very few are connected with any established church. “The fact that many of these professing Christians are not grounded in the Word makes them prime targets for the Mormon missionaries. Churches are in abundance, but many of these are led by pastors with very little biblical education”, he reported in an MRM newsletter.

Africa is a Christian continent and has been so for many centuries. There, as elsewhere, Mormonism has a symbiont relationship with the Christian Church, building where others have laid foundations and planting where others have ploughed.

Wednesday, 3 April 2013

The Book of Mormon Musical

Brendan Behan said, “There is no such thing as bad publicity, except your own obituary.” I suppose to a corporation like the Mormon Church that makes a lot of sense.

The Mormon Church has a correlation committee to which even prophets are subject and that ensures the right, consistent message goes out to the world. It takes every opportunity to publicise its “good works” in church magazines and in ads taken out in prestigious secular publications.

Whatever new technology comes out you can be sure the corporation of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints will utilise it to every advantage and they are really good at it. Indeed, it might be said of them:

Whatever is new, whatever is trending, whatever is slick, whatever is popular, whatever is getting attention, whatever it is people admire – if anything is applauded or praised by the masses – we think about how to capitalise on it.

I wonder, however, if this time they have gone too far. For some time now most of my Google Alerts for Mormonism have been about the progress of The Book of Mormon, the musical written and produced by the makers of that other high point in American culture South Park.

The show opened on Broadway in 2011 and came to the Prince of Wales Theatre in London’s West End in February 2013. It has been described as appallingly vulgar, blasphemous and sacrilegious. Well, what did you expect from the makers of South Park to whom nothing is sacred and there is no such thing as bad taste?

What is puzzling is that the Mormon Church has chased this show around the world, not to protest its appalling treatment of their religion – and religion in general - but to take advantage of the publicity attendant to its success

It had people standing outside the Broadway theatre where it first showed handing out Mormon literature and has taken out billboard ads near theatre’s where it has been playing. Most recently it has bought ads in the show’s official programme in Toronto, Canada.

“You’ve seen the play... now read the book,” says one ad.

“I’ve read the book,” reads another.

“The book is always better,” concludes a third.

There is a link and a QR code that lead to official Mormon sites.

Christians will remember the blasphemous Jerry Springer, the Opera that ran between 2003 and 2005 and the protests outside theatres and in the media from Christians appalled at its blasphemy. How might Christians have reacted if a major denomination had advertised the faith in such a show. That would be the equivalent of what the Mormon Church is doing with this musical. But then the Mormon Church is not a Christian denomination, indeed it is more a business than a religion and acts accordingly.

I am reminded of another quote from Abraham Lincoln

What kills a skunk is the publicity it gives itself